By: Steve Sosnick, Chief Strategist at Interactive Brokers
It’s been my contention for some time that investors are not particularly adept at assessing geopolitical events. Investors are exceedingly good at reckoning with events that directly affect corporate earnings and the like, but much less so at determining how political events will impact their holdings in advance of events. And I also believe that US investors can be particularly myopic when it comes to political moves outside our borders. It is instructive to examine how the markets have dealt with recent events in the UK and China.
As I write this, it appears that Rishi Sunak will be succeeding Liz Truss as UK Prime Minister. Gilt traders are enthusiastic, with benchmark gilt yields down by about 30 basis points, though the FTSE 100 Index and British Pound are greeting the move with muted enthusiasm. The tone of those moves is understandable. Mr. Sunak was considered a stable Chancellor of the Exchequer under Boris Johnson, and thus a known commodity for markets. That is in contrast to the fact that in Ms. Truss’ brief tenure she managed to create a crisis in gilt markets and UK pension funds with a few misguided policies. It is logical to believe that Mr. Sunak will have a more modest set of policies, or at least get a sense of how markets might react before implementing them. Yet it is important to remember how just a few weeks ago, investors had no clue how damaging the then-incoming Prime Minister’s government could be. Markets were blindsided, as they often are when it comes to politics.
The more momentous world political event was the third term for China’s Premier Xi Jinping. Over the weekend it became clear that he was cementing power even further, packing the Politburo with allies. This was interpreted by investors as a furtherance of China’s zero-Covid policies and a greater likelihood of government interference or control of private enterprise. The former is worrisome for the economy, the latter is worrisome for investors in Chinese companies. Yet neither should have been all that surprising. Did we really think that a man who worked single-mindedly to garner an unprecedented third term in order to stay in control of a global power would somehow immediately signal a more inclusive set of policies?
Although investors had no ability to vote on the events at China’s Communist Party Conference, they clearly voted “no” in the immediate aftermath. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index fell by over 6%, the Renminbi lost over 1% against the US dollar, and Chinese shares traded in the US fell sharply amidst renewed concerns about potential delistings. The NASDAQ Golden Dragon Index (HXC) and the KraneShares CSI China Internet Fund (KWEB) are both over 15% lower as I write this. More ominously, KWEB broke down through its all-time low, which was set in March of this year, and HXC is flirting with 10-year lows.
There is no way to sugarcoat the dismal performance of US traded Chinese shares. They are down about 80% from their peak in early 2021. That peak came after a near-doubling from their March 2020 levels. It is understandable why investors would have been enthusiastic about the prospects for companies that could offer high growth in an economic superpower. But a series of political moves – some from the SEC about auditing and some from China about exercising influence over tech magnates – have exerted a downward influence ever since. Neither is likely to abate quickly with the solidifying of Mr. Xi’s rule.
Political events are the sort of “known unknowns” that cause difficulties in markets. We often know that something is coming, but have a difficult time discerning what is already being discounted by investors and how they might react to the inevitable developments that are not fully anticipated. That calls for risk aversion ahead of such events – whether by positioning defensively or hedging.
3-Year Daily Chart, KWEB (blue/white) and HXC (magenta)
Source: Bloomberg
Originally Posted October 24th, 2022 on the IBKR Traders’ Insight Blog
PHOTO CREDIT: https://www.shutterstock.com/g/sepavo
Via SHUTTERSTOCK
DISCLOSURE: INTERACTIVE BROKERS
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers LLC, its affiliates, or its employees.
Any trading symbols displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray recommendations.
In accordance with EU regulation: The statements in this document shall not be considered as an objective or independent explanation of the matters. Please note that this document (a) has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and (b) is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination or publication of investment research.
